Ideological Meaning

UK /ˌaɪ.dɪˈɒ.lə.dʒɪ.kəl/
US /ˌaɪ.dɪˈɑː.lə.dʒɪ.kəl/
Word Definition
ideological meaning

Ideological Definition & Usage

adjective

Relating to or based on a set of beliefs, ideas, or principles, often related to politics, philosophy, or culture.

Examples

  • "His speech was filled with ideological convictions about the future of the nation."
  • "The ideological divide between the two political parties has never been wider."
  • "Many students joined the protest because they shared an ideological commitment to social justice."
  • "The company's policies are driven by an ideological belief in free-market capitalism."
  • "The book explores the ideological differences between Eastern and Western philosophies."
adjective

Pertaining to a particular political or social system of beliefs that influence or guide actions and policies.

Examples

  • "The ideological shift in the country led to new policies on healthcare."
  • "Ideological movements often clash over the interpretation of historical events."
  • "A deep ideological rift within the party led to its fragmentation."
  • "During the Cold War, the world was divided by two dominant ideological blocs."
  • "The ideological roots of the conflict are traced back to centuries-old religious differences."

Cultural Context

The term 'ideological' is commonly used in political discourse, philosophy, and sociological discussions. It traces its roots to Ancient Greek philosophy, where the word 'idea' represented the mental concepts that shape human understanding. Over time, 'ideology' began to refer to systems of thought that influence entire societies, especially in the context of political systems. In modern times, it has become a key term in understanding political movements, conflicts, and changes in societal values.

The Ideological Divide

Story

The Ideological Divide

In the small town of Millford, two groups had been at odds for years. One group, led by Professor Harold Blake, adhered strictly to classical liberalism, emphasizing individual freedoms and free-market economics. The other group, led by activist Sarah Fields, promoted a more collectivist approach, advocating for state intervention to ensure equality and protect the vulnerable. These two ideological camps were constantly at loggerheads, each meeting at the local community hall to debate the future of their town. One evening, as the sun dipped behind the mountains, the two groups gathered again. Sarah stood at the podium first, passionately speaking about the need for social programs and the importance of community over individual gain. Her ideological position was clear: the state had a responsibility to intervene. 'We cannot sit back while some suffer,' she said, her voice strong. Professor Blake, with his calm demeanor, responded with a critique of government control. 'The danger,' he argued, 'is that too much government involvement stifles innovation and the pursuit of freedom.' His ideological stance was rooted in a deep belief in personal responsibility and the invisible hand of the market. As the debate continued, the crowd split—some nodding in agreement with Blake's arguments, others clapping for Sarah's impassioned defense of equality. It was evident that the town was experiencing a growing ideological rift, one that would shape its future for years to come. That night, as the debate wound down, both leaders reflected on their ideological paths. For Sarah, the battle was about achieving justice for the oppressed. For Blake, it was about protecting individual freedoms from the overreach of government. In the end, both leaders knew that their ideological views would continue to shape not just the debates in Millford, but the very fabric of their society. The ideological divide was not just a political argument—it was a clash of visions for the future, one that would continue long after the debate ended.

The Ideological Divide