Discussion Meaning
Discussion Definition & Usage
A conversation or exchange of ideas where individuals express their thoughts, opinions, or arguments on a particular topic.
Examples
- "We had a lengthy discussion about the new policy changes in the company."
- "The discussion on climate change became heated during the meeting."
- "After a long discussion, they finally reached a decision on the project."
- "The team will have a discussion to address the concerns raised by customers."
- "Her discussion of modern art was insightful and thought-provoking."
A formal or informal exchange where differing viewpoints are presented, often with the goal of persuading others or resolving a disagreement.
Examples
- "The political debate turned into a heated discussion about national security."
- "They had a spirited discussion over the merits of the new law."
- "The discussion between the two candidates was intense, but civil."
- "During the discussion on economic policy, several facts were misrepresented."
- "At the end of the discussion, both sides agreed to disagree."
A detailed and critical examination of a topic or issue, typically involving research or analysis in academic settings.
Examples
- "The professor's discussion of Shakespeare's influence on modern literature was enlightening."
- "In her discussion of ancient civilizations, she highlighted the role of trade in cultural exchange."
- "The discussion on quantum physics required advanced knowledge of mathematics."
- "Their discussion of ethics in artificial intelligence covered a wide range of viewpoints."
- "In class, we had a discussion about the philosophical implications of free will."
Cultural Context
The word 'discussion' is commonly used in a variety of contexts, from casual conversations to formal academic debates. It has roots in Latin, where it referred to 'shaking apart' or 'examining,' reflecting the idea of analyzing or exchanging ideas. Over time, the meaning expanded to include any form of verbal exchange.
The Great Debate: A Discussion on Progress
Story
The Great Debate: A Discussion on Progress
In a small town nestled among green hills, the local community center had just set up a debate on the topic of environmental progress. The audience was buzzing with excitement as the two panelists, Sarah and John, took their seats at the long wooden table. Their discussion, moderated by the charismatic Professor Green, was anticipated to be the highlight of the evening. Sarah, a young environmental activist, wasted no time in launching into her argument. 'We cannot continue with business as usual,' she declared, her voice firm. 'The planet is facing a crisis, and we need to change the way we interact with our environment.' John, a businessman with years of experience in the energy sector, raised an eyebrow. 'I agree that we need to find sustainable solutions,' he said, 'but a radical shift could hurt the economy. We need a more measured approach.' The discussion between Sarah and John grew heated, each trying to outmaneuver the other with facts and persuasive rhetoric. The audience watched intently, some nodding in agreement with Sarah's impassioned words, others leaning towards John's cautious approach. It was clear that both sides had valid points, but the real question was how to reconcile them. Professor Green intervened, steering the discussion towards possible compromises. 'Let’s focus on areas where both sides can agree,' he suggested. 'For instance, how can we make renewable energy more accessible without threatening jobs in the traditional energy sector?' As the discussion unfolded, the room became more animated, with members of the audience offering their thoughts. Some were hesitant about the cost of new technologies, while others were eager for bold action. By the end of the night, while no immediate solution had been reached, the discussion had opened many eyes to the complexity of the issue. Later that evening, Sarah and John shared a quiet conversation, acknowledging the value of each other’s perspectives. Though they didn’t agree on everything, they both knew that their discussion had been an essential step toward understanding and progress. The debate, in its most genuine form, was not about winning, but about opening minds and exploring possibilities.