Statute Meaning

UK /ˈstætʃuːt/
US /ˈstætʃuːt/
Word Definition
statute meaning

Statute Definition & Usage

noun

A formal written law passed by a legislative body.

Examples

  • "The new statute requires all businesses to comply with environmental regulations."
  • "The statute on public health was amended to include new provisions for mental health care."
  • "He was convicted under a statute that criminalizes hate speech."
  • "The statute of limitations has expired, so the case cannot be prosecuted."
  • "A federal statute was enacted to prevent discrimination based on gender identity."
noun

A permanent or fixed rule or principle, often adopted by an organization or governing body.

Examples

  • "The company's statute prohibits the use of mobile phones during meetings."
  • "The sports league updated its statute to ensure fair play and equal treatment."
  • "Under the university’s statutes, students must maintain a minimum GPA to stay enrolled."
  • "The organization’s statute mandates that all members contribute to its yearly fundraiser."
  • "According to the statute of the board, no decisions can be made without a quorum."

Cultural Context

The concept of statutes is central to legal systems worldwide. Statutes provide a clear and structured means for governments to regulate society through written laws, offering predictability and consistency. Statutes are generally distinguished from other forms of law such as common law, which develops over time through judicial decisions.

The Enforcer's Dilemma

Story

The Enforcer's Dilemma

In the bustling city of Westford, the courthouse loomed large against the skyline, its stone pillars a constant reminder of the power vested in the law. Thomas, a newly appointed district attorney, stood outside the building, contemplating the day ahead. He had just received a case that would test his understanding of a key statute: the law against corporate fraud. As he entered the courtroom, the defendant, a high-ranking CEO accused of embezzling millions, sat calmly at the defendant's table. Thomas knew the statute under which the CEO was charged was stringent, leaving little room for leniency. The prosecution had the law on their side, but the defense was determined to challenge the interpretation of the statute. 'Your Honor,' the defense attorney began, 'this statute was enacted with the intent of targeting smaller, less powerful entities. We contend that it does not apply in this case, where the actions were conducted within the framework of the corporation's established rules.' The judge, an experienced magistrate, paused before responding. 'The statute clearly defines fraud as the deliberate manipulation of financial records, regardless of the scale of the organization. It is not subject to reinterpretation based on the size or influence of the entity involved.' Thomas smiled inwardly as the defense crumbled under the weight of the statute. His preparation, which had involved understanding the statute’s broader intent, had paid off. The case would be a landmark in his career. After the trial, as Thomas left the courthouse, he met with his colleague, Sarah. 'So, how did you handle the statute?' she asked. 'I stuck to its letter and spirit. It's clear, it's precise, and it worked in our favor,' he replied. Later that evening, Thomas sat down at his desk to review the rules and statutes governing his office. Just as the law could be a tool for justice, it could also be a set of rules that guided the organization’s operations, down to the smallest detail. The statute of the office, much like the law itself, was not just a set of instructions – it was the framework that ensured fairness and order, keeping everyone in check, from the highest to the lowest. In Westford, as in any other place, statutes weren't just abstract concepts; they were the very fabric of society. And today, Thomas had seen how they could shape destinies.

The Enforcer's Dilemma